Teachers of Zilla Parishad schools in Nashik petitioned against recovery of amounts from those who did not complete a stipulated course, relying on an earlier Division Bench order. The court directed notice to Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 with affidavit of service and adjourned the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
JPP
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 8870 OF 2024
Ashok Valmiki Badoge & Ors. … Petitioners V/s. State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents
Ms. Sarita Sonawane i/b. Aarti P. Bhide for the Petitioners Mr. K.S, Thorat,`B’ Panel Advocate for the Respondent - State
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ.
DATE : 02 JULY 2024
P.C. :-
The Petitioners, 35 in number are working as teachers in different schools of Respondent No.2 – Zilla Parishad, Nashik. They have sought to question the action of the Respondents to recover amounts from those who have not completed the stipulated course. The Petitioners are relying on the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Shaikh Amir Shaikh Kadar v/s. State of Maharahtra and Ors.1 .
M.M. SATHAYE, J. NITIN JAMDAR, J.
1 WP 3320 of 2023 dtd. 23 March 2023
JYOTI Digitally signed byJYOTI PRAKASH PRAKASH PAWAR Date: 2024.07.05 PAWAR 10:27:14 +0530
JPP 2 15. WP 8870.24.doc
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Shaikh Amir Shaikh Kadar v/s. State of Maharashtra and Ors.Relied on
WP 3320 of 2023 dtd. 23 March 2023
Ashok Valmiki Badoge & Ors.
State of Maharashtra
Zilla Parishad, Nashik
Nitin Jamdar
M.M. Sathaye
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
