Disposed

Pramukh Vijay Co-Operative Housing Society v. the Divisional Joint Registrar Co-Operative Societies Mumbai Division

Bombay HC24 Jun 2024WP/8685/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging rejection of stay application and direction to grant membership to apartment purchasers. Court accepted counsel's statements that no further construction would occur and subject to right to challenge illegal construction, directed issuance of share certificate within a week.

What did the court decide?

Share certificate to be issued within a week subject to right to challenge illegal construction.

Pramukh Vijay Co-Operative Housing Society vs the Divisional Joint Registrar Co-Operative Societies Mumbai Division — Bombay HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

907-wp8685-24

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.8685 OF 2024

¶4

VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL

¶5

Digitally signed by VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Date: 2024.08.01 19:52:56 +0530

¶6

Pramukh Vijay Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. ...Petitioner Versus

¶7

The Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Mumbai & Ors. ...Respondents

¶8

Mr.Kunal Bhange with Sonal Hemant Mishal, Akshay Pawar and Mohd.Aijaz Sayyed for the Petitioner.

¶9

Mr.Pramod Bhosle with Mr.Prashant Chauhan and Mr.Hitesh Dave for the Respondent Nos.3 and 4.

¶10

Ms.Aloka A. Nadkarni, AGP for the Respondent- State.

¶11

CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J. DATE : 1^st AUGUST, 2024

¶12

P.C.:

¶13

The petition questions the order dated 19.03.2024 passed by the respondent No.1, rejecting the application for stay filed by the petitioner society in a challenge to the order dated

¶14

30.08.2023, passed by the respondent No.2, which directs membership to be granted to the respondent Nos.3 and 4 on account of purchase of apartment No.E-1/41 in the building

1 of 3

VAI

907-wp8685-24

owned by the society.

¶19

The learned counsel for the petitioner upon instructions makes a statement that the grievance is in respect of illegal construction done by the predecessor in respect of the aforesaid flat, which is being constructed by the respondent Nos.3 and 4 in such circumstances, the issue of illegal construction cannot be gone into under the proceedings under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act (MCS Act) and it will be open to the petitioner to take appropriate action against respondent Nos.3 and 4 as well as their predecessor in that regard.

¶20

The learned counsel for the respondent Nos.3 and 4, upon instructions, makes a statement that his clients do not intend to make any construction altogether, which statement is accepted as the statement to the Court.

¶21

In view of this, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the share certificate in respect of flat E-1/41 shall be issued to the respondent Nos.3 and 4 within a week, subject to their right to take proceedings in respect of their claim of there being illegal and unauthorized construction made by the

2 of 3

VAI

907-wp8685-24

predecessor of the respondent Nos.3 and 4 by encroaching the common terrace and constructed a room therein.

¶26

The petition is therefore disposed off in aforesaid terms. Any proceedings by the petitioner society for removal of unauthorized construction, as claimed by it, shall be decided on its own merit.

¶27

(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)

¶28

3 of 3

¶29

VAI

Pramukh Vijay Co-Operative Housing Society v. the Divisional Joint Registrar Co-Operative Societies Mumbai Division

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramukh Vijay Co-Operative Housing Society v. the Divisional Joint Registrar Co-Operative Societies Mumbai Division

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rahul @ Dayanand Rambhavan Tripathi vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Hussain Azim Khan and Ors. vs Zarin Hussain Khan and Ors.

Harichandra Ramchandra Ghadi and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra

Nitin Kashinath Shandilya vs State of Maha. Ministry of the Animal Husbandry Dept. Thr. Its Sec. Mantralaya, Mumbai and Others

Rushi S/O Balwant Dadmal, Being Minor, Thr. Father, Mr. Balwant S/O Narayan Dadmal vs the Dy. Director/ Member Secretary the S.T.. Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur

Sudam Nivrutti Daware vs Hemangi Patil Bhamare the Sub Divisional Officer