Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner had made no effort to circulate it for admission since March 2017, indicating disinterest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
H. C. Shiv 40.w863.17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.863 OF 2017
Sunil Kumar .. Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. S. V. Gavand for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: A. S. GADKARI AND
SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.
DATE : 15th FEBRUARY, 2024
P. C.:-
1)Record indicates that, after 8th March 2017, the Advocate for the
Petitioner and/or the Petitioner has not taken any efforts even to circulate
the Petition for admission.
It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing
present Petition.
2)In view thereof, Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SHYAM C. CHANDAK,J.)(A. S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Digitally signed by HEMANT HEMANT CHANDERSEN CHANDERSEN SHIV SHIV Date: 2024.02.20 18:18:18 +0530
Sunil Kumar
The State of Maharashtra
Anr.
A. S. Gadkari
Shyam C. Chandak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court