record indicates that the petitioners did not pursue the Writ Petition after its filing. The Court dismissed the proceedings for non-prosecution without engaging with the merits of the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Osk 49-Wp-50-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 50 OF 2017
Abhijeet Rohidas More & Ors. … Petitioners
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
None for Petitioners.
Mr. S.V. Gavand, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ. DATE : 14th February 2024.
P.C. :
Petitioners nor his Advocate have taken any efforts even in circulating the Petition for Admission.
It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing
present Petition.
( SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
Digitally signed by OMKAR OMKAR SHIVAHAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN KUMBHAKARN Date: 2024.02.15 11:13:45 +0530
1/1
Abhijeet Rohidas More & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra
A. S. Gadkari
Shyam C. Chandak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
