Vanita Amit Arora v. Panjab Texcom through Its Pro. Pra
Bombay HCWP/8591/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petition challenges a trial court order granting the defendant leave to defend a summary suit subject to depositing a bank guarantee. The court issued notice to the respondent, returnable on 03.07.2024, and requested the trial court to defer judgment in the summary suit until the writ petition is determined.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
P17. CIVIL WP-8591-2024.docx
¶2
Amberkar
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
¶4
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶5
WRIT PETITION NO. 8591 OF 2024
¶6
- Vanita Amit Arora .. Petitioner
¶7
Versus Panjab Texcom .. Respondent
¶8
- Mr. Drupad Patil i/by Mr. Nikhil N. Pawar for Petitioner
¶9
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : JUNE 20, 2024
¶10
P. C.:
¶11
- Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board.
¶12
- Perused the praecipe dated 20.06.2024.
¶13
- Heard Mr. Patil, learned Advocate for Petitioner.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Vanita Amit Arora
- respondent
Panjab Texcom
Coram
AI extract
Milind N. Jadhav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Mr Namdev Dhondiram Yadav (Since Deceased) Thru. Lrs Mr Arun Namdev Yadav vs Mr Vidyadhar Shankarrao Sarnaik (Deceased) Thr. Lrs. Meena Vidyadhar Sarnaik and Ors.
Dada Gena Zende vs Dattu Yedu Gujale
Bharat Ram Barot vs State of Maharashtra
Lucky Sai Multi Services Thr Its Proprietor Balu Chhagan Athavale vs State of Maharashtra Thr Public Prosecutor and Ors.