Petitioners sought consideration of their stay request in a revision application pending against an order by the Additional Divisional Commissioner. Court directed that interim relief be considered on merits and decided within eight weeks, expedited proceedings and kept merits open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SNEHA ABHAY DIXIT
Digitally signed by SNEHA ABHAY DIXIT Date: 2024.07.17 13:15:38 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO.8517 OF 2024
Mr. Sahil Choudhary with Mr. Narayan Rokade, Advocates for the Petitioners.
Mrs. M.S. Srivastava, Assistant Government Pleader for the RespondentState of Maharashtra.
Mr. Bhushan Y. Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR &
RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ
DATE : 16TH JULY, 2024.
ORAL JUDGMENT : { Per A.S. Chandurkar, J. }
1/2
905-WP-8517-2024.doc
Dixit
25th April 2024, it is directed that the prayer for interim relief shall be considered on its own merit and the same be decided within a period of eight weeks from receiving copy of this order. The proceedings in the revision application are expedited.
[ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ]
2/2
905-WP-8517-2024.doc Dixit
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer for grant of stay in the revision application against the Additional Divisional Commissioner's order of 16th February 2024 shall be considered?
Bhikaji Manaji Ghanghav
Sagar Shankar Ghangav
The State of Maharashtra, Through Collector, Nashik
Revenue Commissioner
Bhausaheb Bhikaji Ghanghav
Revenue Minister, State of Maharashtra
A.S. Chandurkar
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
