Adjournment order in two connected writ petitions against the State of Maharashtra; the court could not take up the matters for want of time and adjourned them, continuing interim relief granted earlier.
Ad-interim/interim relief already granted continued till next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 8497 OF 2024
Arun Raghunath Tayade ....PETITIONER V/S
Thes State Of Maharashtra Throu. Govt Pleader ....RESPONDENT And Ors
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 322 OF 2024
Prashant N Sonawane And Ors ....PETITIONER
V/S
State Of Maharashtra And Ors ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. CHANDURKAR &
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ DATE : 20th June, 2024
P.C. :
Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 11/07/2024 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Arun Raghunath Tayade
State of Maharashtra
Prashant N Sonawane And Ors
State of Maharashtra
A.S. Chandurkar
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
