Petition sought direction for consideration of school upgradation proposal. Respondents stated the proposal was forwarded to the State Government. Court directed Respondent No.1 to consider the State Level Authority's report within two weeks and adjourned the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
57.WP.8253.2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 8253 OF 2024
Samarth Samaj, Dombivli, Dist. Thane .. Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra Through School Education and Sports Dept. & Anr. .. Respondents
Mr. Yogesh C. Naidu a/w. Mr Ankul Seth, Mr. Eden Ribeiro, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Shri. N. C. Walimbe, AG a/w. Shri. N. K. Rajpurohit, AGP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ DATE : 16th JULY 2024.
P.C. :
view of the aforesaid, the Respondent No.1 is directed to consider
1/2
ADN
57.WP.8253.2024.doc
the report submitted by the State Level Authority in so far as the Petitioner is concerned, within a period of two weeks from today.
2/2
ADN
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the State should consider the petitioner's proposal for up-gradation of its existing school under the RTE Act and Rules of 2012.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Samarth Samaj, Dombivli, Dist. Thane
State of Maharashtra Through School Education and Sports Dept.
A.S. Chandurkar
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
