Petitioner sought liberty to withdraw the writ petition and pursue other remedies; the court accepted the statement and dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to avail other remedies available in law.
Liberty to avail any other remedy available in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7-WP-8004-2024 (C).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by VASANT VASANT ANANDRAO ANANDRAO IDHOL IDHOL Date: 2024.06.18 18:51:07 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO. 8004 OF 2024
Mahendra Murlidhar Ghule ...Petitioner Versus The Collector Of Pune and Ors. ...Respondents
Ms.Veena Thadani with Ms.Bharti Nyaynirune and Ms.Rutuja Gailwad for the Petitioner.
Mr.Mayur Khandeparkar i/b Mr.Santosh L. Patil and Ms.Shraddha N.Kadam for Respondent No.4.
Mr.P.P. Kakade, G.P. with Mr.G.A. Chaundurkar, G.P. and Mrs.G.R. Raghuwanshi, AGP for the Respondent – State.
P.C.:
seeks liberty to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail any
other remedy available in law.
withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)
1 of 1
vai
Mahendra Murlidhar Ghule
The Collector of Pune
Respondent No.4
State
Avinash G. Gharote
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
