Sandesh Tukaram Nimgire and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The order permits the filing of an affidavit-in-reply by Respondent No.2 within three weeks and adjourns the matter. It does not decide any substantive issue or grant final relief.
What the court decided
CHAITANYAASHOKJADHAV Digitallysigned byCHAITANYAASHOKJADHAVDate:2024.12.1419:51:18+0530
1/1 12-Wp-799-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 799 OF 2024
Sandesh Tukaram Nimgire And Ors. .. Petitioners Versus State Of Maharashtra And Anr. .. Respondents
Mr. Ashwin R. Kapadnis, for the Petitioners.
Ms. M. M. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. Mr. Rajubhau S. Chaudhari i/b Mr. Amey Sirsikar, for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATED : 11th DECEMBER, 2024
P.C:-
- The learned counsel representing the complainant/ Respondent No.2 is desirous of filing an affidavit-in-reply traversing the pleadings in the Writ Petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sandesh Tukaram Nimgire And Ors.
- respondent
State Of Maharashtra And Anr.
Coram
BHARATI DANGRE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court