The court directed respondents to intimate the petitioner regarding a GCZMA decision within two weeks, setting aside the impugned notice due to non-communication.
Quashing of impugned notice and direction to communicate decision within 2 weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 792 of 2023
shakuntala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO.792 OF 2023
JOSE DSOUZA ... PETITIONER Versus THE STATE OF GOA, THR. CHIEF SECRETARY AND 3 ORS., ... RESPONDENTS
Mr J. Lobo, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr Manish Salkar, Government Advocate for the respondents.
CORAM:- BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED :- 1st February, 2024
P.C.
Page 1 of 2
1st February, 2024
WP 792 of 2023
meeting held on 28th and 29th of January 2020, afresh within a period of 2 weeks from today.
BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J.
Page 2 of 2
1st February, 2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to relief for non-communication of the impugned decision?
Jose Dsouza
The State of Goa, Thr. Chief Secretary and 3 Ors.
Bharat P. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
