Single judge order condoning a 526-day delay in filing a First Appeal. Application allowed based on the presence of sufficient cause and the fact that connected matters had already been admitted by this Court.
The application for condonation of delay stands allowed; the delay stands condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MCA 223 of 2022
shakuntala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.223 OF 2022 IN
STAMP NUMBER MAIN NO.1680 OF 2018 (F) THE PROJECT DIRECTOR AND EX-OFFICIO JOINT SECRETARY (RD), PANAJI AND ANR ... APPLICANTS Versus
BHIKARO LAXIMAN NAIK ... RESPONDENT
Mr. Deep Shirodkar, Additional Government Advocate for the Applicants.
Mr. Vibhav Pilankar, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM:- BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED :- 1st February, 2024
P.C.
Page 1 of 2
1st February, 2024
MCA 223 of 2022
BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J.
Page 2 of 2
1st February, 2024
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the nilreturn in the appeal application discloses sufficient cause for condoning a delay of 526 days.
Whether the connected matters previously admitted by this Court constitute sufficient cause to allow condonation of delay in the present First Appeal.
THE PROJECT DIRECTOR AND EX-OFFICIO JOINT SECRETARY (RD), PANAJI AND ANR
BHIKARO LAXIMAN NAIK
BHARAT P. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
