The case is not reported in the provided text; it is a procedural order extending the time for disposal of a regular civil suit.
The case is not reported in the provided text; it is a procedural order extending the time for disposal of a regular civil suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9-WP7622-2019.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 7622 OF 2019
SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI
Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2025.02.18 10:41:58 +0530
Dhondiram Sakharam Shinde (since deceased) through LRs. POA M. D. Shinde …Petitioners Versus Shripati Sakharam Shinde (Since Decd.) Through Lrs. And Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Ranjit Shinde, for the Petitioners.
Mr. Arjun Pawar, for Respondent Nos.1A and 1B.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED: 17th FEBRUARY, 2025
PC:-
Principal District Judge, Satara.
Regular Civil Suit No.225 of 2018 stands extended by six months from today.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
1/1
Santosh Subhash Kulkarni
Dhondiram Sakharam Shinde (since deceased) through LRs.
Shripati Sakharam Shinde (Since Decd.) Through Lrs.
N. J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
