Dinesh Arjun Gilatar v. Daibai Arjun Gilatar (Deceased)
Bombay HCTP/3087/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Compliance listing in a testamentary petition; the petitioner sought six weeks' time to take steps to justify the share of non-consenting legal heirs, and the matter was adjourned.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Before : Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With Testamentary Department Date :- 02nd December, 2024
¶2
FOR COMPLIANCE :
¶3
- TP/3087/2024 P. C. : Shri. Manoj Parajapati i/b Kamya Prajapati Ld. [Original] Advocate for the Petitioner (ECHCBM02096642024) with 1. Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner seeks six weeks’ CHOL/367/2024 time to take steps to justify the share of non(ECHCBM02143192024) consenting legal heirs. Hence, adjourned.
¶4
- S. O. to 21.01.2025
¶5
02.12.2024 Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
Coram
AI extract
P. A. Jagdale
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Kamlesh Kishor Ruparel vs Kishor Vaghji Ruparel(Deceased)
Norma Marina Menezes D/O. Gilbert Menezes @ Norma Marina Menezes vs Marie Harold Menezes
Ramesh Govind Patil vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Prin. Secretary, Rural Development and Ors.
Meghna Moreshwar Pethe vs Vishwanath Vyankatesh Pethe (Deceased)