Plaintiff-petitioner challenged rejection of his plaint amendment adding defendants and sought that the suit not be dismissed while applications were pending. The Court directed him to assist in arguing pending applications and kept the matter for further hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
LSP 1 P-1 wp 7458.24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Writ Petition No. 7458 of 2024
Bharat Atmaram Gowari and others … Petitioners V/s. Riddhi Siddhi Builders & others … Respondents.
| Mr. B.G. Tangsali | Advocate for the Petitioners |
|---|---|
| Mr. Amardev Uniyal | Advocate for Respondent No.1. |
CORAM : S.M. MODAK, J
DATE : 13 November 2024.
Digitally signed by P.C. : LATA LATA SUNIL SUNIL PANJWANI The matter is taken on Board by way of a praecipe in view of PANJWANI Date: 2024.11.19 14:59:22 the urgency quoted by the petitioner. He is the plaintiff. Copy of +0530 the order-sheet produced alongwith praecipe mentions that the suit was fixed for dismissal on 11 November 2024. Now it is kept tomorrow i.e. 14 November 2024.
LSP 2 P-1 wp 7458.24.doc
justifiable reason for dismissal of the suit. If there are pending applications, it is for the plaintiff to assist the Court by arguing those applications.
(S.M. MODAK, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial Court could dismiss the suit for non-prosecution while the plaintiff's amendment application and other pending applications remain undecided.
Bharat Atmaram Gowari and others
Riddhi Siddhi Builders & others
S.M. Modak
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
