In a criminal writ petition, the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the trial court. The High Court granted leave and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file appropriate application before the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMITA Digitally signed bySMITA JOHNSON JOHNSONGONSALVES GONSALVESDate: 2024.03.1516:33:53 +0530
2.wp744-20.doc
1/2
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.744 OF 2020
Sandeep Steels Through CA Bhavin Arvind Mehta
... Petitioner
v/s.
State of Maharashtra And Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. Devendra Tiwari, i/b. Law Chamber of Siddharth Murarka, for the Petitioner.
Ms. Shilpa Talhar, APP, for Respondent State.
Mr. Mrityunjay Barai, for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4.
CORAM : R.N. LADDHA, J.
DATE : 15 MARCH 2024
P.C. :
. After hearing the matter for some time, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to file the appropriate application before the learned trial court.
1 of 2
2.wp744-20.doc
2/2
sg
(R.N. LADDHA, J.)
2 of 2
Sandeep Steels Through CA Bhavin Arvind Mehta
State of Maharashtra
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
