Second appeal pending since 2005; sole appellant died in 2020 and no steps were taken since. The court dismissed the appeal as abated and disposed of the pending interim application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mamta Kale
40-sa-726-2005.doc
MAMTAAMARKALE Digitallysigned byMAMTAAMARKALEDate:2024.03.1417:08:06+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 726 OF 2005
Shri. Raichand Harakchand Baldota ..Appellant Vs. Shri. Dattatray Dada Pimpalgaonkar (Since Deceased) through LRs. and Ors. ..Respondents
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 20642 OF 2022 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 726 OF 2005
Dilipkumar Dattatraya Pimpalgaonkar ...Applicant In the matter between Shri. Raichand Harakchand Baldota ..Appellant Vs. Shri. Dattatray Dada Pimpalgaonkar (Since Deceased) through LRs. and Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. Sugandh Deshmukh, for the Appellant. Mr. P. B. Shah, for the Respondents.
CORAM : R. N. LADDHA, J. DATE : 14 MARCH 2024
P.C.
. Mr. Sugandh Deshmukh, learned counsel states that he has
page 1 of 2
Mamta Kale
40-sa-726-2005.doc
already returned the papers to the appellant on 14 August 2014 and as such, shown his ability to argue the matter.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
page 2 of 2
Shri. Raichand Harakchand Baldota
Shri. Dattatray Dada Pimpalgaonkar (Since Deceased) through LRs.
Dilipkumar Dattatraya Pimpalgaonkar
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
