Writ petition disposed of as infructuous after counsel for the petitioner stated, on instructions, that the issue no longer survives. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:778-DB
(1) wp739.2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.739/2022
Dr.Rajani Mahadev Rathod Vs. State of Maharashtra & others
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders of directions
and Registrar's orders
Mr. Ashish D.Girdekar, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. N.R.Patil, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 4.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATED : 19/01/2024.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
Ambulkar
Dr.Rajani Mahadev Rathod
State of Maharashtra
NITIN W. SAMBRE
ABHAY J. MANTRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
