Writ petition concerning the petitioner's request for transfer was permitted to be withdrawn on instructions. The court directed that the pending representation regarding the transfer request be decided by the Chief Executive Officer, Buldhana, on its own merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 907wp446.2024..odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 446 OF 20 24
(Niranjan s/o. Samadhan Tajne...Vs… The State of Maharashtra and another)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr. P.S. Kshirsagar, counsel for petitioner. Mr. H. Marathe, AGP for respondent No. 1/State.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATED : 19-0 1-2024
On instructions, prayer is made for withdrawal of the petition.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
Belkhede
Niranjan s/o Samadhan Tajne
The State of Maharashtra
NITIN W. SAMBRE
ABHAY J. MANTRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
