The petitioner alleged that the respondent died during the pandemic, rendering the Writ Petition infructuous. The High Court disposed of the matter as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904-wp2394-17.doc
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed VASANT by VASANT ANANDRAO ANANDRAO IDHOL IDHOL Date: 2024.04.2214:37:28 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO.2394 OF 2017
Dr.Archana Y.Thombare ...Petitioner V/s. Dr.Yashwant N. Thombare ...Respondent
Mr.Girish M. Joshi for the Petitioner.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATE : 19TH APRIL, 2024.
P.C. :-
Respondent has died during the pandemic period, therefore, the
present Writ Petition has become infructuous.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
1/1
Dr. Archana Y. Thombare
Dr. Yashwant N. Thombare
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
