Navin Khimji Chheda v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment order in a writ petition concerning eligibility for monetary compensation for a commercial establishment. Respondent No.2 stated the petitioner is not eligible and sought time to file an affidavit confirming this.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Purti Parab 26.1-WP-687-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Digitally PURTI signed byPURTIPRASAD PRASAD PARAB PARAB Date:2025.02.1011:10:04 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION +0530
WRIT PETITION NO. 687 OF 2024
Navin Khimji Chheda … Petitioner V/s.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
… Respondents
Mr. Ajay Talreja for Petitioner.
Mr. Vishal Thadani, Addl. G.P. a/w Ms. Gaurangi Patil, AGP for Respondent No.1-State.
Ms. Meena Dhuri i/b Ms. Komal Punjabi for Respondent No.2-BMC. Ms. Meenakshi Rathod, Sub Engineer, “T” Ward present.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ. DATE : 16th DECEMBER 2024.
P.C. :
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Navin Khimji Chheda
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Yadav Nagar Sra Chs through Its Chief Promoter Madhukar Jyoti Belekar vs the Assistant Municipal Commissioner G/South Ward and 2 Ors.
Mewalal Hiralal Shah vs Chief Executive Officer Slum Rehabilitation Authority
Sohilkumar Dahyabhai Tandel vs Daman Municipal Council and Anr.
Vaibhav Laxmi Builders and Developers through Its Proprietor Ramdas Sangle vs Suresh Harishchandra Khadpe