In Writ Petition No. 6798 of 2024, the Bombay High Court allowed the petitioner's application to withdraw the petition and disposed of the matter accordingly.
Allowed withdrawal of the writ petition and disposed of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KVM
1/1
925 - WP 6798 OF 2024.doc
Digitally signed by KANCHAN KANCHAN VINOD VINOD MAYEKAR MAYEKAR Date: 2024.05.10 19:32:19 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 6798 OF 2024
Shraddha Tushar Kesarkar
….. Petitioner
VERSUS
State Of Maharashtra & Anr. ….. Respondents
Ms.Ankita Phadke with Adv.Rijul Khandare and Ms.Rashika Srivastava for the Petitioner.
Mr.J.P. Pail, AGP for the State – Respondent No.1.
Ms.Meena Pandey for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 9 MAY, 2024
P.C. :-
After the matter was argued for some time, learned counsel
for the petitioner on instructions from his client who is present in
Court, seeks liberty to withdraw this writ petition.
[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]
Shraddha Tushar Kesarkar
State Of Maharashtra
Respondent No.2
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
