Disposed

Suhas Kamlakar Nibandhe v. Gangadhar Hanumant Jakapure

Bombay HC9 May 2024WP/6112/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a civil appeal writ petition involving dispute over suit premises, the High Court at Bombay disposed of the matter after parties agreed. Petitioner was directed to pay further sum and vacate premises; both parties agreed to withdraw pending proceedings and refrain from future litigation after payment and vacating.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to pay further sum, vacate premises, file undertaking; parties agreed to withdraw pendency and refrain from future proceedings.

Suhas Kamlakar Nibandhe Vs Gangadhar Hanumant Jakapure — Landlord and Tenant | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

KVM

¶2

1/3

¶3

919 - WP 6112 OF 2024.doc

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶5

Digitally signed by KANCHAN KANCHAN VINOD VINOD MAYEKAR MAYEKAR Date: 2024.05.10 20:17:42 +0530

¶6

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO. 6112 OF 2024

¶8

Suhas Kamlakar Nibandhe

¶9

….. Petitioner

¶10

VERSUS

¶11

Gangadhar Hanumant Jakapure

¶12

….. Respondent

¶13

Mr.Hemant Ghadigaonkar for the Petitioner.

¶14

Mr.Ashwin V. Sakelkar for the Respondent.

¶15

Mr.Suhas K. Nibandhe, Petitioner present in person.

¶16

CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

¶17

DATE : 9 MAY, 2024

¶18

P.C. :-

¶19

After the matter was argued for some time, learned counsel

¶20

for both the parties agree to dispose of this petition with certain directions.

¶21

2. Writ petition is disposed of with certain directions :-

¶22

(i) A sum of Rs.1,00,000/- deposited by the

¶23

petitioner with the respondent to be adjusted towards payment due of the respondent.

¶24

KVM

¶25

2/3

¶26

919 - WP 6112 OF 2024.doc

¶27

(ii) The petitioner to pay a further sum of

¶28

Rs.1,00,000/- by a period of two weeks from today in the bank account of the respondent.

¶29

(iii) The petitioner would vacate the suit premises latest by 31 May, 2024.

¶30

(iv) The petitioner will file an usual undertaking within a period of one week, a copy of which would be served upon the respondent’s advocate thereby mentioning that the petitioner and his family members who are the only persons residing in the suit premises. The petitioner will not create any third party interest and the petitioner will clear consumption of entire electricity bill till 31 May, 2024.

¶31

(vi) The undertaking given by the petitioner will be considered as an undertaking given to this Court.

¶32

KVM

¶33

3/3

¶34

919 - WP 6112 OF 2024.doc

¶35

(vii) Both the parties agree that they will take steps

¶36

to withdraw the proceedings filed against each other. Both the parties will also agree that henceforth, after the premises is vacated on 31 May, 2024 and a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- is paid within a period of two weeks from today, they will not file any further proceedings against each other.

¶37

Writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

¶38

[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]

Suhas Kamlakar Nibandhe v. Gangadhar Hanumant Jakapure

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suhas Kamlakar Nibandhe v. Gangadhar Hanumant Jakapure

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs. Sonal Sandeep Khaire Vs Mr. Sandeep Bhikanrao Khaire

Sou. Anjali Virendra Bobde Vs Virendra Radhakrushna Bobde

Kirti Rahul Bhavsar Vs Rahul Prakash Bhavsar and Anr.

Poojalaxmi Angad Ghule Alias Poojalaxmi Atmacharan Shinde Vs Angad Mahendra Ghule

Shraddha Tushar Kesarkar Vs State of Maharashtra

Anuj Sajjan Kumar Nirmal Vs Sneha Anuj Nirmal