Interim adjournment order in a writ petition; time granted to respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to file reply, matter stood over for further hearing.
A bare administrative order granting the respondents' counsel time to file reply and listing the writ petition for a future date; it decides nothing of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp6726.2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.6726/2024
(Ramchandra S/o Anandrao Tekam Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others)
Mr. R.M. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. S.S. Hulke, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.1.
CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE & MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATED: 17.12.2024.
Mr. Sachin Zoting, learned Advocate appearing for the respondent Nos.2 and 3 is granted time to file reply as prayed for.
(MRS.VRUSHALI V.JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
Tambaskar.
Signed by: MR. N.V. TAMBASKAR Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 17/12/2024 16:07:59
Ramchandra S/o Anandrao Tekam
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
Vrushali V. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
