Writ petition by an educational institution against the State of Maharashtra and others was adjourned on the petitioner's request to 14 October 2024. The court clarified that pendency of the petition is not a stay of any order or proceedings and directed it not be circulated before hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
50-WP-6694-24.doc
Shubhada S Kadam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 6694 OF 2024
Moni Vidyapith Gargoti Through Director, P.B.Patil … Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. Sumit Patil, Amit Icham, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S.D. Rayrikar, AGP for the Respondent No.1-State.
Ms. Vrushali Maindad along with Ms.Simran Raut, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
P.C. :
request, stand over to 14th October 2024.
1/1
Moni Vidyapith Gargoti Through Director, P.B.Patil
State of Maharashtra
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3
Shubhada S Kadam
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
