Petitioner complained against the rejection of an application to amend a written statement. Court declined to entertain the petition as the suit was at the stage of final argument, allowing challenge only via appeal if an adverse decree passes.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:12652
1 / 1 19.wp6685.2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 6685 OF 2024
Gita w/o Ramrao Wadafale Vs. Umesh s/o Laxmanrao Bobhate
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. R.D. Hajare, Advocate for petitioner.
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J.
DATE : 18.11.2024.
This petition takes exception to the order dated 13.09.2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge Junior Division, Seloo, below Exhibit 98 in Regular Civil Suit No.21/2014.
(N.R. BORKAR, J.)
Prity
Gita w/o Ramrao Wadafale
Umesh s/o Laxmanrao Bobhate
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
