Disposed

Koradi Prakalp Matsya Vyavsay Co-Op. So. Ltd., Thr. Chairman, Wasim Khan Habib Khan Pathan v. State of Maha., Thr. Minister, Co-Op. Society (Fishery), Mumbai

Bombay HC14 Nov 2024WP/6515/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court declined to entertain the writ petition challenging the State Government's interim stay order but directed the Government to decide the pending revision within four months on its own merit.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed the State Government to decide the revision within four months of this order on its own merit.

Koradi Prakalp Matsya Vyavsay Co-Op. So… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

81-wp-6515-24(j).odt

¶2

¶3

2024:BHC-NAG:12678

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶5

Writ Petition (WP) No. 6515 of 2024

¶6

Koradi Prakalp Matsya Vyavsay Co-operative Society Limited, Buldhana Versus

¶7

State of Maharashtra, through the Minister, Co-operative Societies (Fishery), Mantralaya, Mumbai and others

¶8

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order

¶9

Shri A.P.Kalmegh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Kalyani Marpakwar, AGP for the respondents/State. Shri C.A.Babrekar, Advocate for the respondent no.6.

¶10

CORAM : N.R.BORKAR, J. DATED : 14^th NOVEMBER, 2024.

¶11

This petition takes exception to the interim order dated 4^th October, 2024 passed by the State Government in Fishery Dept-2024/Case No.84/PDM13.

¶12

The respondent no.6 herein has filed the revision before the State Government against the order of Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies (Fisheries). By the order impugned, the State Government has stayed the order passed by the Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies (Fisheries).

¶13

SKNair

¶14

2 81-wp-6515-24(j).odt

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that caveat was filed before the State Government and therefore, the State Government ought to have heard the petitioner before passing the order impugned. It is submitted that order impugned cannot be allowed to stand as the same is passed on factually incorrect ground. It is submitted that the impugned order be therefore set aside and the State Government be directed to decide the stay application afresh.

¶16

I am not inclined to entertain the present petition against the interim order. However, considering the facts and circumstances, the following order is passed.

¶17

i. The State Government shall decide the revision filed by respondent no.6 within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. ii. Needless to mention that the State Government shall decide the revision on its own merit without being influenced by the fact that this Court has not interfered with the findings recorded in the impugned order.

¶18

The writ petition is disposed of in aforesaid

¶19

terms.

¶20

SKNair

Koradi Prakalp Matsya Vyavsay Co-Op. So. Ltd., Thr. Chairman, Wasim Khan Habib Khan Pathan v. State of Maha., Thr. Minister, Co-Op. Society (Fishery), Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Koradi Prakalp Matsya Vyavsay Co-Op. So. Ltd., Thr. Chairman, Wasim Khan Habib Khan Pathan v. State of Maha., Thr. Minister, Co-Op. Society (Fishery), Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pawankumar Bharti S/O Kisanlal Bharti Vs Abrar Ahmed S/O Late Abdul Majid Ahmed

Lady Yashodabai Joshi Ladies Club, Thr. Secretary, Amravati and Another Vs Shri. Harvijay Keshavrao Kalamkhede and Another

Kirankumar S/O Babulalji Mehadia and Ors. Vs Nagpur Municipal Corporation Thr Municipal Commissioner

Ramesh Laxman Sonawane vs the State of Maharashtra

Vikas Dilip Kudale vs the State of Maharashtra

Swapnil Bhau Kajale vs the State of Maharashtra