Two writ petitions were disposed of as infructuous after counsel for the petitioners submitted that due to passage of time the petitions had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22-WP-6576-2021+.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
rrpillai
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 6576 OF 2021
Smt. Anita Jaywant Patil … Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another … Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 6577 OF 2021
Dipti Shekhar Bhatt … Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another … Respondents
Mr. Ramchandra K. Mendadkar for the Petitioner through VC. Mr. P. V. Nelson Rajan, AGP for the State.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 19th MARCH 2024
P.C.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to passage of
time petitions are rendered infructuous.
2. Writ Petitions are disposed of as infructuous.
RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date: 2024.03.20 10:46:32 +0530
1/1
Smt. Anita Jaywant Patil
State of Maharashtra
Dipti Shekhar Bhatt
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court