Petitioners challenged a Revenue Minister's order remanding a land records matter, filed five years after the order. With no explanation for delay or laches, the court declined to invoke Article 227 powers and dismissed the petition as devoid of merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
26-WP-3501-2023.docx
rrpillai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3501 OF 2023
Dhondiram Sambhaji Gaikwad and Another … Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others … Respondents
Mr. Machhindra A. Patil for the Petitioners. Mr. Shubham H. Misar for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5. Ms. M. S. Bane, AGP for the State.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 19th MARCH 2024
P.C.
Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAJESHWARI RAMESH RAMESH PILLAI PILLAI Date: 2024.03.21 11:00:15 +0530
1/2
26-WP-3501-2023.docx
impugned order the learned Minister has set aside the order passed on 28th March 2014 and remanded the matter back to the Deputy Director Land Records.
see any ground to invoke the powers under Article 227 of the Constitution for interfering with the impugned order.
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging a 2017 remand order, filed after five years without explanation for the delay, should be entertained.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dhondiram Sambhaji Gaikwad and Another
The State of Maharashtra and Others
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court