The High Court of Bombay, Mumbai Bench discharged Writ Petition No. 6414 of 2001 as infructuous upon instructions from counsel. The pending interim application was also disposed of. No substantive legal issues were addressed.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; interim application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27-ASWP-6414-2001.DOC
2024:BHC-AS:935
Gaikwad RD
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6414 OF 2001 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2003 OF 2002 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.6414 OF 2001
Madansingh Ranjitsingh Pardeshi …Petitioner Versus The Returning Officer, Saptashringi Gramin Bigarsheti Sahkari Patsanstha Maryadit. …Respondent
…Petitioner
Mr. P. N. Joshi , for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. P. Kakade, Government Pleader , with Mrs. S. D. Vyas, Addl. GP & Mr. A. R. Metkari, AGP, for the Respondent.
CORAM Dr. Neela Gokhale, J. DATED: 9th January 2024
PC:-
1. The learned Government Pleader (Appellate Side) had circulated in the Registry a list of old infructuous matters so that these matters could be listed and disposed as infructuous. This petition is one such matter.
2. Upon instructions, both the learned counsel state that the petition is infructuous. Hence, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Page 1 of 2 9th January 2024
27-ASWP-6414-2001.DOC
3. In view of dismissal of petition, interim application pending therein also stands disposed of.
(Dr. Neela Gokhale, J)
Page 2 of 2
9th January 2024
Madansingh Ranjitsingh Pardeshi
The Returning Officer, Saptashringi Gramin Bigarsheti Sahkari Patsanstha Maryadit
Dr. Neela Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
