Arbitration Petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as neither party appeared on the initial date nor provided any representation by the date of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9-ARP-97-2022.DOC
2024:BHC-AS:778
Gaikwad RD
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.97 OF 2022
Updater Services Pvt. Ltd. …Petitioner Versus Raymond Apparel Ltd. …Respondent
None for the Petitioner. None for the Respondent.
CORAM Dr. Neela Gokhale, J. DATED: 8th January 2024
PC:-
1. The petition seeks appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes arising from the service agreement of January 2018 between the parties. On 19th August 2023, when the matter was called out, none appeared for the parties. Even today, there is no representation from either of the parties.
2. In view of the same, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Dr. Neela Gokhale, J)
Page 1 of 1 8th January 2024
Updater Services Pvt. Ltd.
Raymond Apparel Ltd.
Dr. Neela Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
