Petitioners stated the writ petition had become infructuous since the term of the Grampanchayat was over. The court disposed of the petition as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:2497
1 wp628.2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.628/2019
(Sandhyatai W/o Dilip Alone and others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. Anand Deshpande, Counsel for petitioners. Mr. J.Y. Ghurde, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. T.S. Deshpande, Counsel for respondent No.4.
CORAM: MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J. DATED: 1.3.2024.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petition has rendered infructuous as the term of the Grampanchayat is over.
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.)
Tambaskar.
Sandhyatai W/o Dilip Alone and others
The State of Maharashtra
Vrushali V. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
