Two writ petitions by the same petitioner against irrigation officials were withdrawn after respondents stated the proposal had been sent to the Rural Development Department; petitions disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 10.10a.wp.22.19.1002.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.22 OF 2019
Sau. Manorama Panjabsingh Khutpale
..vs..
The Dy. Engineer, M.I. Sub-Divisiona, Akola and ors.
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.1002 OF 2021
Sau. Manorama Panjabsingh Khutpale
..vs..
The Dy. Engineer, M.I. Sub-Divisiona, Akola and ors.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri N.D. Sonare, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri M.V. Bute, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM: MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J . DATED : 01/03/2024.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petitions as the learned Counsel for respondent nos.1 to 3 have made a statement that the proposal is sent to the Rural Development Department.
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.)
Trupti
Sau. Manorama Panjabsingh Khutpale
The Dy. Engineer, M.I. Sub-Divisiona, Akola
Vrushali V. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
