Counsel for the petitioners stated she had no instructions to argue the writ petition on merits despite notice to the petitioners. The High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
VARSHA VIJAY RAJGURU Digitally signed by VARSHA VIJAY RAJGURU Date: 2024.03.30 15:45:37 +0530
5-wp-606-1999.doc
varsha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 606 OF 1999
Smt. Bhikabai P. Patil (Pawar) since deceased through her legal heirs and Anr
… Petitioners
vs.
Shri Bali Pandu Patil(Decd) through Heirs and … Respondents Lrs and Ors
Ms. Pratibha D. Shelake i/b. R.A. Thorat, for Petitioners. Mr. G.H. Keluskar, for Respondent.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATED : 28th MARCH, 2024
P.C. :-
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that initially the
petitioners had informed that the parties have settled the dispute out of court however, she did not have instructions to withdraw the petition. She submits that she had called for necessary instructions from the petitioners. She states that letter is served upon the petitioners, however, no instructions are received.
(GAURI GODSE, J.)
Page no. 1 of 1
Smt. Bhikabai P. Patil (Pawar) since deceased through her legal heirs
Anr
Shri Bali Pandu Patil (Decd) through Heirs and Lrs
Ors
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
