Disposed

Vineet Sing Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd., Thr. Auth. Officer, Adv. Sachin Kulkarni v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Water Resource Dept., Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC11 Oct 2024WP/5955/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner's technical bid for a lift irrigation tender was rejected for non-furnishing PTEC and PTRC and lacking certification of similar work. After the court expressed a prima facie view that the certificate relied on covered identical work, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Petition withdrawn; no order as to costs.

Vineet Sing Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd., Thr… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:11839-DB 930-WP-5955-24.odt

¶2

1/2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.5955 OF 20 24

¶5

Vineet Sing Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. Abhyankar Nagar, Nagpur, O/a Kashyap Complex Jarhabhata, Indu Udyan Chowk, Bilaspur, Chhatisgarh

¶6

-vs-

¶7

State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Water Resource Dept. Mantralaya, Mumbai and ors.

¶8

Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and the Registrar's orders.

¶9

Shri G. C. Khond, Advocate for petitioner.

¶10

Shri N. S. Rao, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.1. Shri P. B. Patil, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 4.

¶11

CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : October 11, 2024

¶12

Mr P. B. Patil, learned counsel representing the respondent Nos.2 to 4 have placed an affidavit affirmed by the Executive Engineer, Lift Irrigation Project Division, Tirora, District Gondia, which is taken on record.

¶13

We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner on the previous day and even today in regard to grievance of rejection of his technical bid on 25/09/2024 for the reasons that have specifically set out at page 1049 of the petition.

¶14

The disqualification being not only on the ground of nonfurnishing the PTEC and PTRC but also because of the petitioner not being certified to be engaged in similar work.

¶15

The counsel for the petitioner has relied upon a certificate dated 05/08/2024 issued by the Office of Executive Engineer, Water Resource Division, Manendragarh (C.G.). When Mr Patil has confronted us with the specification of the scope of work which includes Earth work, Structures as well as Canal Lining work with the specifications set out

¶16

930-WP-5955-24.odt

¶17

2/2

¶18

in the tender notice, and when we expressed our prima facie view that the work indicated in the certificate and the one which is desired by the tendering Authority is identical, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition.

¶19

The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.

¶20

No order as to costs.

¶21

(Abhay J. Mantri, J.) (Bharati Dangre, J.)

¶22

Asmita

Vineet Sing Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd., Thr. Auth. Officer, Adv. Sachin Kulkarni v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Water Resource Dept., Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vineet Sing Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd., Thr. Auth. Officer, Adv. Sachin Kulkarni v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Water Resource Dept., Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ku. Sandhya Shrawan Makarande @ Mrs. Sandhya Uddhav Samudre Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Department of Higher and Technical Education, Mumbai and Ors.

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Thr Its Authorized Representative Mr Narendra Dekate and Others Vs Janus Aviation Pvt. Ltd. Borjhar Guwahati Assam

Adwait Sanjay Kamdi Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secy., Dept. of Education, Mumbai and Ors.

Lina Vishwanath Yerme Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Secretary, Schol Education Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Chetan S/O Kantibhai Patel Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Collector, Gondia and Another

Shri. Chhotelal S/O Mangal Patalbansi Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary and Oth.