Petitioner's writ petition regarding deemed date of promotion was disposed. Court recorded standing counsel's statement that the grievance was redressed. No order as to costs.
Petition dismissed on assurance from respondent that grievance was redressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1-WP-3856-12.odt
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO.3856 OF 20 12
Chhotelal S/o Mangal Patalbansi, Buldhana
-vs-
State of Maharashtra, Thr. Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Mumbai and ors.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and the Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
None for the petitioner.
Shri J. Y. Ghurde, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 to 4. Ms Meghna Munshi, Advocate for respondent No.5.
CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
DATE : October 11, 2024
On 13/09/2024, we referred to the pursis filed by the petitioner, in absence of the petitioner, noting that the respondent-Zilla Parishad had given assurance that the representation of the petitioner for deemed date of promotion shall be considered.
We deem it appropriate to dispose of the petition by recording a statement made by Ms Meghna Munshi, counsel appearing for the respondent-Zilla Parishad that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed.
No order as to costs.
(Abhay J. Mantri, J.) (Bharati Dangre, J.)
Asmita
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's grievance regarding deemed date of promotion has been redressed.
Chhotelal S/o Mangal Patalbansi
State of Maharashtra, Thr. Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Mumbai
Bharati Dangre
Abhay J. Mantri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
