Adjournment order only. Time sought by petitioner's counsel was granted and the writ petition (No. 584 of 2024) was listed for further hearing on 13 August 2024, with a clarification that no interim order had been passed in the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Megha
35_wp_584_2024.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.584 OF 2024
Kripa Shankar Sitaram Nishad ….Petitioner
V/s.
Tolaram Lachhiram Chudiwala (since deceased)1A. Vikas Tolaram Chudiwala and Ors.
....Respondent
__________________________________________________ Mr. D.K. Shukla for the Petitioner.
Mr. J.J. Thakkar for the Respondent
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Dated : 9 July 2024
P.C. :-
MEGHA SHREEDHAR PARAB
Digitally signed by MEGHA SHREEDHAR PARAB Date: 2024.07.11 11:49:23 +0530
[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]
___Page No.1 of 1 ___ 9 July 2024
Kripa Shankar Sitaram Nishad
Tolaram Lachhiram Chudiwala (since deceased)
Vikas Tolaram Chudiwala and Ors.
SANDEEP V. MARNE
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
