Writ petition dismissed as not prosecuted after the petitioner repeatedly failed to appear when the matter was called.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) 210wp5818.11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 5818/2011
Narayanrao Manikrao Choudhary .Vs. Samudrapur Taluka Sahakari Shetki Kharedi Vikri Sangh
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 30, 2024
On previous date, following order was passed.
“None present for the petitioner when called.
It appears that the petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter.
List this matter after two weeks under the caption of "dismissal".”
None appears for the petitioner today. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition.
The writ petition is dismissed as not prosecuted.
(Anil L. Pansare, J.)
Kahale
Narayanrao Manikrao Choudhary
Samudrapur Taluka Sahakari Shetki Kharedi Vikri Sangh
Anil L. Pansare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
