Writ petition dismissed as not prosecuted after the petitioner repeatedly failed to appear when it was listed for dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) 901wp3921.19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.3921/2019
Vinod Narayanrao Manikpure .Vs. Nirmala Ukandrao Uikey and Ors.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 27, 2024
On 10.09.2024, following order was passed.
“None appears for the petitioner.
List the petition under the caption, “For Dismissal”, on 27.09.2024.”
None appears for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed as not prosecuted.
(Anil L. Pansare, J.)
Kahale
Vinod Narayanrao Manikpure
Nirmala Ukandrao Uikey
Anil L. Pansare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
