The High Court directed the Director, Higher Education, to decide the petitioners' pending CAS promotion proposal arising out of a 2018 communication within six weeks.
Direct respondent No.2 to take appropriate decision on the proposal dated 11 October 2018 within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
933-wp-5792-2024 (Corrected).odt
Corrected copy : Corrections have been carried out in view of the speaking to the minutes of the order dated 21.06.2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
933 WRIT PETITION NO.5792 OF 2024
[1]
933-wp-5792-2024 (Corrected).odt
Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110002.
Mr. Mehul Vikas Navandar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. D. R. Korde, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 – State.
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND SHAILESH P BRAHME, JJ. DATE : 19 JUNE 2024
ORDER :-
The petitioners who stand retired as Professors from respondent No.6 – University are awaiting pension.
[2]
933-wp-5792-2024 (Corrected).odt
October 2018 (Exhibit-J) received from the Registrar of the University on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within
a period of six weeks.
scm
[3]
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent Director should be directed to dispose of the pending CAS promotion proposal expeditiously.
Whether a timeline should be fixed for the decision on the proposal dated 11 October 2018.
Prof. Bishnu Charan Barik
Prof. S. Mohan Karuppayil
The State of Maharashtra
Director, Higher Education
Joint Director, Higher Education
Vice-Chancellor Swami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada University
Mangesh S. Patil
Shailesh P. Brahme
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
