Disposed¶12

Shaikh Rizwan Gulab v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Bombay HC18 Jun 2024WP/5659/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench; WP 5659/2024; Shaikh Rizwan Gulab v. State of Maharashtra; writ petition withdrawn with liberty; grievance redressal committee; government resolution dated 27-03-2024; 30-day limitation waived; impugned order dated 24-01-2024; committee to decide on merits and expeditiously; writ petition no. 1182 of 2024 directions.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty to apply to the grievance redressal committee constituted under the government resolution dated 27-03-2024; the committee is to entertain the grievance on its merits, not dismiss it solely on limitation grounds, and decide expeditiously. ¶12

Shaikh Rizwan Gulab Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others — Bombay HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶12

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner may be granted liberty to approach the grievance redressal committee notwithstanding that the 30-day limitation period under the government resolution dated 27-03-2024 had already lapsed since the impugned order dated 24-01-2024.

¶11

Court's answer

Leave was granted to withdraw Writ Petition No. 5659 of 2024, with liberty to the petitioner to apply to the grievance redressal committee constituted pursuant to the government resolution dated 27-03-2024 (which was issued pursuant to this Court's directions in writ petition no. 1182 of 2024), notwithstanding that the 30-day limitation period under that resolution had expired.

¶10

Ratio / Principle

The grievance redressal committee is directed to entertain the petitioner's grievance/appeal on its own merits and shall not dismiss it only on the ground of limitation; the committee shall take its decision as expeditiously as possible.

¶16

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Shaikh Rizwan Gulab v. State of Maharashtra (High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad; Writ Petition No. 5659 of 2024; decided 18 June 2024; Coram: Mangesh S. Patil & Shailesh P. Brahme, JJ.) — Writ petition challenging an order dated 24-01-2024 was permitted to be withdrawn with leave to apply to the grievance redressal committee constituted pursuant to the government resolution dated 27-03-2024, which resolution was itself issued pursuant to the Court's directions in writ petition no. 1182 of 2024. Though the resolution's 30-day limitation period had lapsed since the impugned order, the Court granted liberty to move the committee and directed that the committee entertain the grievance on its own merits, not dismiss it merely on the ground of limitation, and decide expeditiously.

Shaikh Rizwan Gulab v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shaikh Rizwan Gulab v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Linesh Tulshiram Khadke Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Others

Vyankatramana Rajaram Manolwar Vs Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee Latur through Its Member Secretary and Others

Jaymala Dattatray Patil and Others and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Ganesh Pralhad Bhutte Vs the State of Maharashtra through Tis Secretary and Others

Vaishnavi Pralhad Bhutte Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Sachin Shankar Bankar Vs Ashwini Sachin Bankar