The High Court of Bombay permitted the petitioner to withdraw an old writ petition declared as infructuous and disposed of the matter accordingly, vacating interim orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23-ASWP-5628-2010.DOC
Digitally signed by SHAMBHAVI SHAMBHAVI NILESH NILESH SHIVGAN SHIVGAN Date: 2024.01.08 17:31:30 +0530
Shivgan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.5628 OF 2010
Rama Nagnath Savalkar …Petitioner Versus The Sub Divisional Magistrate and Ors. …Respondents
Ms Veena Thadani , for the Petitioner.
Mr P.P.Kakade , Government Pleader, with Mr OA Chandurkar, Addl.GP with Mr. AR Metkari, AGP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: Dr. Neela Gokhale, J. DATED: 8th January 2024
PC:-
1. The learned Government Pleader (Appellate Side) had circulated in the Registry a list of old infructuous matters so that these matters could be listed and disposed as infructuous. This petition is one such matter.
2. Ms. Veena Thadani, learned counsel for the Petitioner, states that the petition is infructuous and seeks liberty to withdraw the same. Permission is granted.
3. The petition is disposed as withdrawn with no order as to
Page 1 of 2
8th January 2024
23-ASWP-5628-2010.DOC
costs. All interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
(Dr. Neela Gokhale, J)
Page 2 of 2
8th January 2024
Rama Nagnath Savalkar
The Sub Divisional Magistrate and Ors.
Dr. Neela Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
