Petitioner prisoner seeking relief through criminal writ petition. Court disposed of the petition as infructuous because the petitioner had already served his entire sentence and been released from jail on 19.04.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 6 wp 555.23
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 555/2023
(Rahul Dagdu Shirsat Vs. State of Maharashtra & anr.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. Priyesh M. Anjikar, Advocate (appointed) for petitioner. Mrs. S.V. Kolhe, APP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM: VINAY JOSHI AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATED : 23/10/2024.
Heard.
( ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (VINAY JOSHI, J.)
Gohane
Rahul Dagdu Shirsat
State of Maharashtra
Vinay Joshi
Abhay J. Mantri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court