Incarcerated applicant sought condonation of delay in filing an appeal against conviction. The State raised no objection; the court held that the applicant being in jail was sufficient reason, allowed the application and admitted the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:11988-DB
1 34-appa 1040.2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO. 1040 OF 2024 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL (STAMP) NO.8756 OF 2024
( Bhujang Zintu Kannake (In Jail) vs. The State of Maharashtra )
Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.
Mrs.Sonali Gadhawe, (appointed) Advocate for the applicant. Mr. A.B.Badar, APP for respondent.
CORAM : VINAY JOSHI AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 22, 2024
CRIMINAL APPEAL (STAMP) NO.8756 OF 2024
( ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. )
( VINAY JOSHI, J. )
KOLHE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the appeal against conviction should be condoned where the applicant is in jail.
Bhujang Zintu Kannake
The State of Maharashtra
Vinay Joshi
Abhay J. Mantri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
