Petitioner sought reconsideration of a rejected amendment application relating to subsequent events moved after commencement of trial. The court issued notice for final disposal to respondents, returnable after two weeks, permitted private service, and directed removal of office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 14 wp 5406-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.5406 OF 2024
(Dr. Rajendra s/o Gopikisanji Kalantri Vs. Smt. Pratibha w/o Shivshankar Kaushik and others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Shri R.M. Bhangde, Advocate for Petitioner.
CORAM : A NIL S. KILOR, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 12, 2024.
JUDGE
R.S. Sahare Signed by: Mrs. Ranjana Sahare Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 12/09/2024 15:14:48
Dr. Rajendra s/o Gopikisanji Kalantri
Smt. Pratibha w/o Shivshankar Kaushik
S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
