Writ petition adjourned because petitioners had not paid process fees to effect service on unserved respondents; two weeks' time granted and matter adjourned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
29.WP.5383-24.DOCX
Pradnya
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5383 OF 2024
Chandni Naresh Chug and ors. …Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. …Respondents
Mr. Prasad Keluskar , i/b. Mr. Drupad S. Patil, for the Petitioners. Mrs. Rupali Shinde, AGP , for the Respondent-State.
CORAM M.S. Sonak & Kamal Khata, JJ. DATED: 15th July 2024
PC:-
1. On 8th May 2024 we have ordered notices on the unserved Respondents. However, on 6th June 2024, it was found that the Petitioners have not paid process fees and supplied copies of the Petition to effect the service. Today, when the matter was called out, the same position continues and learned counsel for the Petitioners seeks further two weeks’ time to pay process fess and supply copies to effect the service on the unserved Respondents.
2. Time as prayed for is granted, and the Petition is adjourned to 10th September 2024 as the Petitioners, do not seem to be in a great hurry to pursue this matter.
(Kamal Khata, J)
(M.S. Sonak, J)
Page 1 of 1 15th July 2024
Signed by: Pradnya Bhogale Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 16/07/2024 11:19:50
Chandni Naresh Chug and ors.
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
M.S. Sonak
Kamal Khata
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
