Adjournment order only. Proxy counsel for the respondents' advocate sought a brief accommodation; the writ petition was re-notified to a later date. The court decided nothing on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
57-WP-5359-24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO.5359 OF 20 24
Digambar Bholanath Dere, Wardhaman Nagar, Chowk, Nagpur
-vs-
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Nagpur and anr.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders. or directions and the Registrar's orders.
Shri U. J. Deshpande, Advocate for petitioner.
Ms Anshula Paunikar, Advocate h/f Smt R. S. Sirpurakar, Advocate for respondents.
CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : September 30, 2024
(Abhay J. Mantri, J.) (Bharati Dangre, J.)
Asmita
Signed by: Smt. Asmita A. Bhandakkar Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 01/10/2024 18:42:11
Digambar Bholanath Dere
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Nagpur
Anr.
Bharati Dangre
Abhay J. Mantri
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
