Allowed

Suresh Appa Kolekar and Ors. v. Vithal Sahakari Kukkutpalan Andi Khareedi Vikri Prakriya Sangh Ltd. through Secretary and Ors.

Bombay HC26 Feb 2024WP/535/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court quashed the Minister's order staying the Divisional Joint Registrar's order. Relying on prior precedent, the Court held the second revision under section 154 was not maintainable and directed the Divisional Joint Registrar to decide the pending appeal.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order dated 24 December 2019 passed by respondent No.4-Minister is quashed and set aside. The Divisional Joint Registrar is directed to decide Appeal No.7 of 2019 within eight weeks.

Suresh Appa Kolekar and Ors. Vs Vithal Sahakari… — Cooperative Societies | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

35-wp535-2020.doc

¶2

VRJ

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.535 OF 2020

¶5

VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV

¶6

Digitally signed byVAIBHAV RAMESHJADHAVDate: 2024.02.2617:21:37 +0530

¶7

Suresh Appa Kolekar & Ors. … Petitioners V/s.

¶8

Vithal Sahakari Kukkutpalan Andi Kharedi Vikri Prakriya Sangh Ltd. Through Secretary & Ors. … Respondents

¶9

Mr. Umesh R. Mankapure for the petitioners.

¶10

Mr. Pralhad Paranjape with Mr. Manish Kelkar for respondent No.1.

¶11

Mr. Y. D. Patil, AGP for the State/respondent Nos.2 to 5 & 7.

¶12

Mr. Gajanan M. Savagave for respondent Nos.8 to 15.

¶13

Mr. A. Y. Sakhare, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dilip Bodake for respondent Nos.16 & 17.

¶14

Ms. M. S. Srivastava, AGP for the State.

¶15

CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.

¶16

DATED : FEBRUARY 26, 2024

¶17

P.C.:

¶18

The challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated 24^th December 2019 passed by the Minister-respondent No.4 granting stay to the order dated 22^nd November 2019 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar..

¶19

The petitioners are the members of respondent No.1-Society. On 15^th April 2010, respondent No.1-Society passed a resolution

¶20

¶21

35-wp535-2020.doc

¶22

admitting 143 persons as members of respondent No.1-Society. Some members challenged the action of respondent No.1 admitting 143 persons as member of respondent No.1-Society by filing dispute No.5 of 2015 before the Cooperative Court under section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The dispute is pending, however, interim relief was refused.

¶23

On 15^th March 2019, members of respondent No.1-Society filed a complaint before the District Registrar under section 11 read with 25A of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 for holding an inquiry into qualifications of 143 members admitted on 15^th April 2010.

¶24

On 9^th September 2019, the Assistant Registrar Cooperative Societies passed an order under section 11 read with section 25A of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 holding 143 persons as ineligible for being members of respondent No.1Society.

¶25

On 22^nd November 2019, the petitioners filed Appeal No.7 of 2019 before the Divisional Joint Registrar. The Divisional Joint Registrar, by order dated 22^nd November 2019, granted stay to order dated 9^th September 2019.

¶26

In the meantime, election program for period 2019 to 2024 was published by the Returning Officer.

¶27

On 9^th December 2019, based on stay granted by the Divisional Joint Registrar, the Election Officer included names of 143 members in the voters list.

¶28

¶29

35-wp535-2020.doc

¶30

One of the members of respondent No.1-Society approached the Joint Registrar Cooperative Societies, however, by order dated 24^th December 2019, the Joint Registrar refused to grant stay. The member, therefore, approached respondent No.4-Minister.

¶31

By impugned order dated 24^th December 2019, the Minister granted stay to the order dated 22^nd November 2019 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar. Immediately on the next date, the Election Officer deleted names of 143 persons and declared the election result. The petitioners have, therefore, filed present writ petition.

¶32

The issue relating to maintainability of second revision under section 154 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, is no longer res integra in view of full bench judgment of this Court in Shireen Sami Gadiali & Anr. vs. Spenta Co.op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. & Ors. reported in 2011 (3) Mah.L.J. 486. Therefore, respondent No.2 could not have entertained second revision application. Hence, I am satisfied that second revision was not maintainable. In the result, order dated 24^th December 2019 cannot be sustained. Hence, following order:

¶33

a) Impugned order dated 24^th December 2019 passed by respondent No.4-Minister is quashed and set aside.

¶34

b) The Divisional Joint Registrar is directed to decide Appeal No.7 of 2019 within eight weeks from the date of appearance of the parties.

¶35

c) The parties shall appear before the Divisional Joint Registrar Cooperative Societies (Milk), Pune on 4^th March

35-wp535-2020.doc

2024 at 10:30 a.m.

In view of aforesaid order, no fresh notice are required to be issued to the parties to the appeal. The writ petition stands disposed of in above terms. No costs.

¶40

It is made clear that the Divisional Joint Registrar shall decide the petitioners’ appeal on its own merits uninfluenced by the observations made in the impugned order or by the Joint Registrar Cooperative Societies (Milk), Pune.

¶41

(AMIT BORKAR, J.)

¶42

Suresh Appa Kolekar and Ors. v. Vithal Sahakari Kukkutpalan Andi Khareedi Vikri Prakriya Sangh Ltd. through Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Appa Kolekar and Ors. v. Vithal Sahakari Kukkutpalan Andi Khareedi Vikri Prakriya Sangh Ltd. through Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Vaman Chavan Vs the President, Shiposhi Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and Ors.

The Liquidator, Karmaveer Kakasaheb Wagh Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Vs Namdeo Ranoji Khapare and Ors.

The Liquidator, Karmaveer Kakasaheb Wagh Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Vs Namdeo Ranoji Khapare and Ors.

Sagar Pralhad Dhamdhere Vs District Magistrate (Collectorate ) Pune and Ors.

Shantilal Keshav Shah Since Decd and Ors. Vs Devram Kathod Suroshe Since Decd Thru Lhrs and Ors.

Siddheshwar Devasthan Trust Vs Sanjay Bhimashankar Thobde