Dismissed

Sagar Pralhad Dhamdhere v. District Magistrate (Collectorate ) Pune and Ors.

Bombay HC26 Feb 2024WP/2526/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This verdict dismisses a writ petition alleging jurisdictional error by the District Magistrate in ordering possession under MPC Rules 107. The court held that the finality of the certificate u/s 101 prevents challenge here, and allegations of fraud must be raised before the Revisional Authority.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed with no costs.

Sagar Pralhad Dhamdhere Vs District Magistrate… — Company and Corporate | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

9-wp2526-2024.doc

¶2

VRJ

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.2526 OF 2024

¶5

VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV

¶6

Digitally signed byVAIBHAV RAMESHJADHAVDate: 2024.02.2617:21:36 +0530

¶7

Sagar Pralhad Dhamdhere … Petitioner V/s. District Magistrate (Collectorate) Pune & Ors. … Respondents

¶8

Mr. Mateen Shaikh with Mr. Suresh and Ms. Muskan for the petitioner.

¶9

Mr. Vishwatej Jadhav for respondent No.4.

¶10

Mr. Y. D. Patil, AGP for the State/respondent No.8.

¶11

CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 26, 2024

¶12

P.C.:

¶13

The petitioner is challenging order passed by the District Magistrate in exercise of power under Sub-rule 11(d-1)(vi) of Rule 107 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961 permitting Special Recovery Officer to take possession of premises owned by the petitioner. It is not in dispute that certificate under section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 is not challenged before the Revisional Authority under section 154 of the said act. It is not in dispute that certificate under section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 has attained finality. Only challenge pending before the Revisional Authority is

¶14

¶15

9-wp2526-2024.doc

¶16

demand notice issued by Special Recovery Officer under Rule 107 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961. Once the contents of 101 certificate has attained finality, it is open for the Special Recovery Officer to execute the certificate by following procedure under section 107 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961. Therefore, the District Magistrate has not committed error of jurisdiction of issuing order of delivery of possession.

¶17

According to the petitioner, certificate 101 has been obtained by fraud as the amount has already been paid by the petitioner before initiation of proceeding under section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. Such contention needs to be raised before the Revisional Authority under section 101 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. In this proceeding such adjudication cannot be done by the District Magistrate.

¶18

Hence, there is no merit in the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

¶19

(AMIT BORKAR, J.)

¶20

Sagar Pralhad Dhamdhere v. District Magistrate (Collectorate ) Pune and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sagar Pralhad Dhamdhere v. District Magistrate (Collectorate ) Pune and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Vaman Chavan Vs the President, Shiposhi Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and Ors.

The Liquidator, Karmaveer Kakasaheb Wagh Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Vs Namdeo Ranoji Khapare and Ors.

The Liquidator, Karmaveer Kakasaheb Wagh Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Vs Namdeo Ranoji Khapare and Ors.

Suresh Appa Kolekar and Ors. Vs Vithal Sahakari Kukkutpalan Andi Khareedi Vikri Prakriya Sangh Ltd. through Secretary and Ors.

Shantilal Keshav Shah Since Decd and Ors. Vs Devram Kathod Suroshe Since Decd Thru Lhrs and Ors.

Siddheshwar Devasthan Trust Vs Sanjay Bhimashankar Thobde