Petitioners sought adjournment after counsel for Respondent No.1 reported the respondent's death; the court adjourned the writ petition to 11th November, 2024, granting time to take steps.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1-WP-5325-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5325 OF 2024
Tanaji Ganpati Mane (Decd.) Thr Lrs. …. Petitioners aA. Aniket Tanaji Mane and Ors.
Versus
Shri Mahamadhanif Abdul Sutar …. Respondent
Digitally signed by SHANTANU SHANTANU SHANKARSA SHANKARSA DHUDUM DHUDUM Date: 2024.10.04 10:56:43 +0530
Adv. S. G. Karandikar i/b Mr. Rahul Soman, for the Petitioners. Mr. Vivek Rane i/b Mr. Kalpesh Patil, for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 1st OCTOBER, 2024.
P.C. :
At his request, stand over to 11th November, 2024.
( SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Shantanu Dhudum 1/1
Tanaji Ganpati Mane (Decd.) Thr Lrs. Aniket Tanaji Mane and Ors.
Shri Mahamadhanif Abdul Sutar
Shivkumar Dige
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
